Nasim Taleb, author of “Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder,” argues that education pays real benefits at a micro level because it allows families to lock in their economic status. An entrepreneurial father can ensure his kids will do OK by paying for them to become doctors and lawyers. But what is true at the micro level is not always true at the macro level.
Think about it this way: Growing economies spend a lot on education, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that spending makes them grow. During the so-called Gilded Age, the U.S. economy roared faster and longer than ever before or since, while the illiteracy rate went down. But the rising literacy didn’t cause the growth. Similarly, in the 20th century, in places like China, South Korea and India, the economic boom — and the policies that create it — always come first while the investments in education come later.
نوشته اصلی از سوی Aquarius
نه شما خیلی کینه ای تر آن چیزی هستید که فکرش را می کردم.. لا اقل قدری شخصیت برای خودتان در بحث ها بذارید ... یا شاید هم در ده کوره ای ، دهاتی چیزی بزرگ شده اید ... بدبخت اطرافیانتان از این حماقتتان چه ها که نمی کشند.
پاسخ با گفتآورد
